I really like my current workflow with Grok Bot. Instead of one assistant that does everything, I work with a small team of bots that each have one job. This page shows who does what, how the work flows between them, and one real project: the 2027 budget deck for my council group, the UWG Halver.
My primary bot and the one I talk to first.
A research and fact-check desk with live web search.
Turns notes and research into on-brand decks, built in Slidev.
I sit on the city council in Halver for the UWG (Unabhängige Wählergemeinschaft). In October the city published its draft budget for 2027, and our group needed to understand it before the budget debate. The question on the cover slide: How does Halver get out of its structural deficit before the reserve is gone, and what do we ask of the district (Kreis) and the administration?
Research. Shaka worked through the draft budget (as of 12 October 2026) in a spreadsheet. Researchy benchmarked the Märkischer Kreis against other districts in NRW, using the district’s own draft budget, official gazettes, state audit reports (GPA NRW) and the local press. Some of what came out:
| Finding | Basis |
|---|---|
| Halver's ordinary result is negative in every plan year: −7.2 m€ in 2027, −8.2 m€ in 2030. The general reserve falls from 27.0 m€ to 2.1 m€. | Draft budget 2027, Halver |
| In 2027, 77.6 % of Halver's taxes and key allocations go to the district, up from 63 % in 2025. | Draft budget 2027, city's own definition |
| The district's general levy (Kreisumlage) rises from 408.4 m€ (2026) to 449.1 m€ in the 2027 draft, about +10 %. | Märkischer Kreis, draft budget 2027 |
| About 306 m€, roughly 68 % of that levy, goes to social spending and the regional association LWL, i.e. mostly transfer spending. | District preliminary report, local press |
| The draft levy rate of 50.55 % was the highest known draft rate for 2027 in NRW (as of 18 October 2026). | Researchy's district benchmark |
Deck building. Deck Designer turned this into a 32-slide German deck with my slidev-theme-uwg-halver theme, which uses the UWG’s colours, font and logo. The structure is classic consulting: one key message on top (“without countermeasures Halver heads into budget consolidation, the main driver is the levy to the district”), a pyramid with six pillars, an issue tree, and a chapter tracker on every slide. One deliberate choice: the deck says the district is expensive but does not claim it is inefficient, because the evidence does not show that.
Review loop. Every number on the slides was checked again in a separate number check file, and a per-slide source list replaced “the bots said so” with primary sources. Open points, like figures the city treasury still has to confirm, stay marked in yellow on the slides until they are settled. The repo ended up with about 20 commits of small, reviewable steps, most of them ending with a fresh PDF export.
With more and more decks, I lost track of them. So Shaka built me an interactive Grok Bot page that lists all my slide-deck repos in one table: the decks (the 2027 budget, a wind-turbine assessment, an AI talk, an economic-crisis deck), my two Slidev themes slidev-theme-uwg-halver and slidev-theme-tokyo-night, and the slidev-starter-uwg-halver template. Each row shows the type, category, theme, last push and slide count, and a category filter plus a newest/oldest sort make it quick to find one.
Open the slide-deck repo overview
The page and the repos are private, so the link may ask for access.
A Slidev deck is plain Markdown: YAML frontmatter picks the layout, --- starts a new slide, and anything more special is a Vue component. That is exactly the kind of file models are good at. They can read the whole deck, change one slide, and I review the change as a Git diff. The real check is the export: the bots render PDF and PNG and look at every slide.
What impressed me most is how well they build new themes. For the UWG theme, a bot pulled the colours, font, logos and slogans from uwghalver.de and logged a source for every value. It then built 18 layouts (cover, agenda, council motion, KPI grid, an A4 report page and more) and 9 components, such as a chapter tracker and print-friendly bar, column and share charts. It also wrote an example deck that uses every layout, a starter script for new decks, and a skill so the other bots use the theme the same way.
Using a layout is just frontmatter. This is the KPI slide at the bottom right above, shortened and with trimmed labels:
---
layout: kennzahlen
kapitel: 2
kennzahlen:
- wert: "4"
label: Maßnahmen
- wert: "1,9"
einheit: km
label: Radverkehrsführung
akzent: true
---
My second theme, slidev-theme-tokyo-night, recreates the look of Omarchy’s Tokyo Night desktop and has a light mode. Both themes were first committed on the same day.
When the theme was not enough, the bots extended it. The budget deck needed a waterfall chart from 2025 to 2027 and columns with negative values, so Deck Designer wrote two small Vue components for that deck instead of pasting in images. It is not magic, though: the bots only see a slide once it is rendered. Overflowing text and cramped source lines show up in the export, and one whole commit in the budget deck went into fixing them on every slide. That is why every round ends with an export that the bots and I actually look at.
This is a prototype page. I will keep adding to it as the workflow changes.